It costs nothing at design stage and it is the difference between a die that ejects cleanly for a hundred thousand shots and one that scores parts, distorts them and wears itself out early. Almost nobody argues about it, and that is exactly why it keeps getting left off.
The full story: a $9,400 "design revision" line on a mould quote →
An injection mould in good steel can run for a very long time. An aluminium die cannot, and the reason is physical: molten aluminium thermally cycles the die steel on every single shot until it heat-checks.
| Realistic die life | Why | |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminium (ADC12) | 50,000 – 100,000 shots | Hot metal, cold chamber, aggressive thermal cycling |
| Zinc (Zamak) | Considerably longer | Runs cooler in a hot chamber machine — far kinder to steel |
If a quote implies hundreds of thousands of shots from an aluminium die, it is describing something else.
Ask which alloy the number assumes.
But here is the part that matters more, and almost nobody says it: for most brands, die life is not the constraint people think it is. A product selling 5,000 units a year will not consume a 50,000-shot die in a decade. You are being sold — and quoted for — durability you will never use. The number that should worry you is not die life. It is the re-cut after your first design revision.
Conventional high-pressure die casting traps some gas. That is not a defect — it is the process. It becomes a problem in exactly three situations, and all three are predictable in advance:
Cut into a section and you can open a pore that was harmlessly sealed inside. This is the classic leak that appears only after post-machining, not at the casting stage.
If it must hold air, water or oil, say so before the tool is designed. Gating, venting, wall sections and possibly vacuum assist all change. Impregnation becomes a routine step, not a rescue.
Porosity plus high silicon content is why die castings do not anodize like extrusion. The full explanation →
All three are cheap to design for and expensive to discover. The discovery usually happens at first article, when the tool exists and the options have narrowed to bad ones.
| ADC12 (aluminium) | Zamak (zinc) | |
|---|---|---|
| Machine | Cold chamber, 200–800T | Hot chamber, 138–250T |
| Weight | Light | Roughly three times heavier |
| Fine detail & thin walls | Good | Better |
| Heat dissipation | Better | Poorer |
| Die life | 50k–100k shots | Considerably longer |
| Plating | Difficult | Plates beautifully |
| Decorative anodizing | Not really | No |
The decision is almost never about price per kilogram. It is weight versus detail versus tool life — and if the part is going to be chrome plated, zinc usually wins before the conversation starts.
Two hot chamber machines at 138–250T and five cold chamber at 200–800T, with tapping, drilling, sand blasting, high and low temperature spray coating, polishing and ultrasonic cleaning on the same site. Post-machining of castings runs on the same 158-machine CNC and EDM floor.
The group holds ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and IATF 16949. The ISO scope reads "Design and Production of Moulds for Plastic Injection" — it does not cover die casting.
I would rather you learned that here than during due diligence. It is also exactly the check I would want you running on any supplier, including me: everyone can produce a certificate; almost nobody volunteers the scope page. Full detail →
Send it before tooling is quoted. You get back the draft, wall and porosity risks that will drive the price and the rejects.
DFM review & rates →Cast, mould or machine from solid — the answer is volume arithmetic.
When to stop machining →What we actually pay for ADC12, Zamak and mould steel, published from our own procurement records.
The cost index →